M.Lourdusamy v. D.Poulraj
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court Condoned the petitioner delay in filing a revision petition and directed the office to number and admit the petition.
What did the court decide?
Condonance of 137 days delay and direction to admit the Cr.P.Sr.No.19426 of 2017.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Fourth day of October Two Thousand Seventeen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU
CMP(MD) No.9079 of 2017 IN CRP(MD) No.SR19426 of 2017
M.LOURDUSAMY ... PETITIONER / PETITIONER
Vs
1 D.POULRAJ ... RESPONDENT / RESPONDENT
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to condone the delay of 137 days in representing the above CRP.SR.No.19462 of 2017.
PRAYER IN CRP(MD) No.SR19426 of 2017:-
to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 09.03.2017 passed in I.A.No.396 of 2016 in I.A.No.1447 of 2014 in O.S.No.213 of 2013 on the file of Additional District Munsif Court, Srivilliputhur, and pass such further or other orders, as this Hon'ble Court.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.LOURDUSAMY
- respondent
D.POULRAJ
Coram
J.NISHA BANU
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court