The High Court of Madras, in an order dated 14.03.2017, dismissed a Civil Revision Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as withdrawn by the petitioner. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 14.03.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
C.R.P.(PD).No.970 of 2017 and C.M.P.No.4811 of 2017
P.Govindasamy
... Petitioner
Vs.
Kuppusamy
... Respondent
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and final order dated 16.11.2016 in I.A.No.197 of 2015 in O.S.No.442 of 2012 passed by the District Munsif Court, Dharapuram.
For Petitioner : Mr.B.Singaravelu
For Respondent : Mr.P.Thamilavel
O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought the
permission of this Court to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition and has also
made an endorsement to that effect in the grounds of the revision.
2.In view of the above, the Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Index : No Internet : Yes va
14.03.2017
2
M.DURAISWAMY,J. va
To
The District Munsif Court, Dharapuram.
C.R.P.(PD).No.970 of 2017 and C.M.P.No.4811 of 2017
14.03.2017
P.Govindasamy
Kuppusamy
M.DURASWAMY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
