The High Court of Madras dismissed a Civil Revision Petition challenging an interim injunction order as infructuous because the impugned ex-parte order had already been passed by the trial court, rendering the current challenge unsustainable.
The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous; the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 25.10.2017
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMAR
CRP.PD.No.3694 of 2017
and
C.M.P.No.17129 of 2017
Sundaram ..Petitioner
Vs.
Thirulogachandar, ..Respondent
PRAYER :
The Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the
Constitution of India challenging the Ex-parte Order of Ad-interim
injunction dated 06.07.2017 made in I.A.No.336 of 2017 in
O.S.No.114 of 2017 by the Subordinate Court, Ponneri.
For Petitioner : Mr.Durai Kanan
ORDER:
In view of the orders has been passed by the trial court in
2
O.S.No.114 of 2017, nothing survives for adjudication in the present Civil Revision Petition.
25.10.2017
Speaking/Non-speaking order
Index : Yes/No
Internet : Yes/No
lok
3
To
The Subordinate Judge,
The Sub Court,
Ponneri.
4
D.KRISHNAKUMAR. J,
lok
CRP.PD.No.3694 of 2017
and
C.M.P.No.17129 of 2017
25.10.2017
5
Sundaram
Thirulogachandar
D. Krishnakumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
