Kamalam v. R.Soundarajan
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners filed a Civil Revision Petition to set aside a fair rent decree. The High Court dismissed the petition as infructuous because the landlord had vacated the premises and the execution petition had terminated.
What did the court decide?
The Civil Revision Petition was dismissed as infructuous with no costs.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated:12.10.2017
CORAM
The Hon'ble Mr.Justice M.V.MURALIDARAN
CRP.No.3248 of 2007
1.Kamlam
2.Santha
3.Geetha
vs.
1.R.Soundarajan
2.R.Soundaresan
3.R.Raju
.. Petitioners
vs.
.. Respondents
Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control Act 18 of 1960) praying to set aside the common fair and decreetal order dated 28.11.2006 in R.C.A.No.15 and 47 of 2002 on the file of the Rent Control Appellate Authority (Sub Court), Coimbatore revising the fair rent fixed by the Rent Controller (Principal Additional District Munsif Court), Coimbatore in RCOP.No.296 of 1998.
For Petitioner :Mrs.A.B.Reehana Begham for T.R.Rajaraman
M.V.MURALIDARAN, J.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kamlam
- petitioner
Santha
- petitioner
Geetha
- respondent
R.Soundarajan
- respondent
R.Soundaresan
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court