Dismissed

Witco India Pvt. Ltd. v. Minor.K.M.Muzzammil

Madras HC11 Aug 2017CRP/1738/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This one-paragraph order in a civil revision petition concerning lease and rent control accepted the petitioner's submission that they had vacated the premise, handed over possession, and paid dues. The court recorded these facts and dismissed the petition accordingly.

What did the court decide?

The Civil Revision Petition was dismissed. Connected miscellaneous petition closed. No costs.

Witco India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Minor.K.M.Muzzammil — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated : 11.08.2017

¶4

Coram

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ

¶6

C.R.P.(PD) No.1738 of 2017

¶7

and C.M.P. No 8220 of 2017

¶8

M/s Witco India Pvt. Ltd. Rep. by its Managing Director having show room at No. 109, W Block, New No. 18, First & Second Floor Portions, Anna Nagar, Chennai-600 040. ...Petitioner Vs. 1. Minor K.M. Muzzammil Rep. by his father and natural guardian K.A. Mujibur Rahman 2. Mrs.Rilwana Banu ...Respondents

¶9

Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 25 of Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease & Rent) Control Act 1960, against the Judgment and Decree dated 04.04.2017 passed in RCA.No. 105 of 2015 by the IX Small Causes Judge, Chennai (Rent Control Appellate Authority) reversing the Fair and Decreetal Order passed by the XI Small Causes Judge, Chennai in R.C.O.P No. 1941 of 2007 dated 23.12.2014 (Rent Control Appellate Authority).

¶10

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶11

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Rajasekar For Respondent : M/s.P.Wilson Associates

¶13

ORDER

¶14

The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that

¶15

the petitioner has vacated and handed over vacant possession to the respondents herein. He has also filed a memo dated 07.08.2017 to that effect, which reads as under:

¶16

"MEMO FILED ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER "
The above named Revision Petitioner respectfully submits as
follows:-
The Revision Petitioner has vacated on 04.08.2017 the

¶17

Ground Floor on the southern side of the premises bearing No.W109, New No.18, Third Avenue, Anna Nagar, Chennai 600 040, being the subject matter of the present Civil Revision Petition and handed over vacant possession of the aforesaid premises to the respondents herein.

¶18

The Revision Petitioner has paid the agreed rent and other dues upto 04.08.2017 to the respondents herein and received proper acknowledgments on 05.08.2017, true copy of which is filed along

¶19

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶20

¶21

with this Memo.

¶22

Hence it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to record the above facts and dispose of the Civil Revision Petition and thus render justice.

¶23

Dated at Chennai this the 7th day of August 2017."

¶24

Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the memo filed, this Civil Revision petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected civil miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶25

11.08.2017
(3/3)

¶26

Index : yes/no bsm/tk

¶27

To XI Small Causes Judge, Chennai.

¶28

M.GOVINDARAJ, J.

¶29

bsm/tk

¶30

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶31

¶32

C.R.P.(PD) No.1738 of 2017
and C.M.P. No. 8220 of 2017

¶33

11.08.2017

¶34

http://www.judis.nic.in

Witco India Pvt. Ltd. v. Minor.K.M.Muzzammil

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Witco India Pvt. Ltd. v. Minor.K.M.Muzzammil

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. N. Anna Reddy Vs Mr. J. Pandian

M/S. Criss Cross Vs D.N. Saravanan

Duraisamy Vs Palanisamy

M/S.Witco India Pvt.Ltd., Vs Anis Fathima

M/S.Witco India Pvt.Ltd., Vs K.A. Mujibur Rahman

P.Ravichandran Vs M.Kavitha