A.Raju v. a.Krishnakumar
Case brief
What is this about?
In a cheque dishonour case pending appeal, the High Court set aside the appellate court's order dismissing a petition for additional documents, directing the lower court to consider the documents filed during the appeal.
What did the court decide?
The order dismissed in Crl.M.P.No.721 of 2015 was set aside and the Sessions Judges directed to consider additional documents filed by the petitioner.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 15.12.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M.BASHEER AHAMED
Crl.R.C.(MD)No.399 of 2016
and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.4825 of 2016
A.Raju ... Petitioner/Petitioner/Appellant Vs.
1.A.Krishnakumar
2.State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by Public Prosecutor, Kanyakumari District
at Nagercoil. ... Respondents/Respondents/Respondents
PRAYER: The Petition filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C. to call for the records and set aside the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.721 of 2015 in C.A.No.30 of 2008 dated 23.04.2016 on the file of the Sessions Judge (Fast Track Mahila Court), Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil against S.T.C.No.2206 of 2005 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel, dated 13.02.2008 and to allow this Criminal Revision Petition.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to set aside the Sessions Judge's order dismissing a miscellaneous petition for receiving additional documents in a cheque dishonour cheque case.
Whether to direct the appellate court to consider additional documents filed by the petitioner during the pendency of the appeal.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A.Raju
- respondent
A.Krishnakumar
- respondent
State of Tamil Nadu
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court