The High Court dismissed the criminal revision case filed by the victim under Section 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. as withdrawn with liberty to file an appropriate appeal before the First Appellate Court.
The revision case was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file an appeal before the First Appellate Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 20.07.2017
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR
Criminal Revision Case No.946 of 2017
Meenakshiammal ..Petitioner
Vs
M.Murugavel ..Respondent
Prayer:- This Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Section
397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. against the judgment dated 24.05.2017
made in C.C.No.172 of 2011 passed by the Learned Fast Track
Judicial Magistrate of Thiruthuraipoondi.
For Petitioner : Mr. M. Balasubramanian
ORDER
Mr.M.Balasubramanian, learned counsel for the revision petitioner submits that in view of the proviso to Section 372 of Cr.P.C., the victim is entitled to file an appeal before the first
2
R. SURESH KUMAR.J.
Appellate Court. Hence, she may be permitted to withdraw this revision with liberty to file appeal before the first Appellate Court.
before the first Appellate Court and Registry is directed to return the
original documents to the learned counsel for the petitioner
forthwith.
20.07.2017
rli
To
The learned Judicial Magistrate,
Fast Track Court,
Thirurhuraipoondi.
CRL. RC. No.946 of 2017
3
3 provisions across 1 enactments
Meenakshiammal
M. Murugavel
R. SURESH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
