The High Court dismissed a revision filed under CrPC 397 and 401 against an order dismissing a petition under CrPC 239, as the case was withdrawn by counsel.
Revision case dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20.07.2017 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR Crl.R.C.No.167 OF 2017
D.Jesudoss : Petitioner
versus
The State represented by Sub Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Kancheepuram District
Revision filed under section 397 & 401 CrPC against the order dated 16.12.2016 in C.M.P.No.1071 of 2016 in C.C.No.238 of 2013 on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Sriperumbudur, dismissing the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 239 of Cr.P.C.
For petitioner : Mr.J.C.Durai Raj
Mr.J.C.Durai Raj, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has got instructions from the petitioner to withdraw this revision case. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS VIII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
tar
To
2.The Public Prosecutor,
Madras High Court
3.The Sub Inspector of Police,
District Crime Branch,
Kancheepuram District
4.Do Through The Chief Judicial Magistrate
Kancheepuram
Crl.R.C.No.167 OF 2017
rr(co)
aa09/08/2017
D.Jesudoss
The State represented by Sub Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Kancheepuram District
R.SURESH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
