This court dismissed a criminal revision challenging the dismissal of a protest petition in an investigation into alleged temple rent collection. The court found no illegality in the police closure report or the lower court's order.
Criminal Revision Case dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.01.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
CRL.R.C.No.913 of 2011
E.P.Parthasarathy … Petitioner Vs. State by Inspector of Police, Team XXI, Central Crime Branch, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008 … Respondent Criminal Revision Case filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Code against the order of dismissal dated 21.05.2009 made in Crl.M.P.No.2209 of 2008 in X.Cr.No.656 of 2007 passed by the XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai- 600 015 For Petitioner : Mr. S.Senthilnathan For respondent : Mrs. M.F.Shabana, Gov. Advocate (Crl. Side) O R D E R
The Criminal revision has been filed challenging the order of dismissal passed by the learned XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai, in the protest petition filed by the petitioner.
investigation, final report has been filed referring it as mistake of fact. After receipt of the final report, a notice has been issued to the defacto complainant/petitioner, and he had filed a protest petition. After considering the petition, the court below dismissed the protest petition filed by the defacto complainant/petitioner. Aggrieved over the same, the present revision has been filed.
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
mrp
To
1. The XI Metropolitan Magistrate,
Saidapet, Chennai- 600 015
2. The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
3 The Inspector of Police
Team XXI
Central Crime Branch, Egmore, Chennai 600 008
+1cc to Mr.S. Senthilnathan, Advocate, S.R.No.843
ad(CO)
md(06/02/2017)
Crl.R.C.No.913 of 2011
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the closure of the complaint by the police and dismissal of the protest petition were legal and free from illegality.
Whether the High Court is justified in dismissing the criminal revision under Sections 397 and 401 CrPC.
E.P. Parthasarathy
State by Inspector of Police
V. Bharithidasan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
