Single judge dismissed the Criminal Revision Case filed under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. as the prohibitory order passed under Section 144 Cr.P.C. over two months prior was no longer in force.
Criminal Revision Case dismissed; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.01.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
CRL.R.C.No.1438 of 2011
and
M.P.No.1 of 2011 Senthil @ Ramesh … Petitioner Vs. The Sub Divisional Magistrate(North), Puducherry … Respondent Criminal Revision Case filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Code to call for the records and set aside the order dated 29.09.2011 passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate (North),Puducherry in M.C.No.887 of 2011. For Petitioner : Mr. R.Rajaram For respondent : Mr. M.R.Thangavel, Public Prosecutor, Pondicherry.
O R D E R The Criminal revision has been filed against the order passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate (North),Puducherry in M.C.No.887 of 2011 under Section 144 Cr.P.C.
Sd/-
Asst.Registrar
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
mrp
To
1. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate(North),
Pudhcherry
2. The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
Crl.R.C.No.1438 of 2011
nr1(co)
ss(7/2/2017)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal revision filed under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. can be entertained after the statutory period under Section 144 Cr.P.C. has elapsed.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Senthil @ Ramesh
The Sub Divisional Magistrate(North), Puducherry
V. Bharathidasan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
