V.Latha v. a.Natesan
Case brief
What is this about?
This criminal revision disposed of against convictions for cheque dishonour under Section 138. The High Court dismissed the petition, finding no reason to interfere as the presumption under Section 139 was not rebutted.
What did the court decide?
Criminal Revision Case and connected miscellaneous petition dismissed and closed.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 09.08.2017
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.T. SELVAM
Crl.R.C.No.640 of 2009
and
M.P.No.1 of 2009
V.Latha
W/o.L.Sadhasivam .. Petitioner
vs.
A.Natesan
S/o.Alagappan .. Respondent
Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. against the judgment of learned I Additional Sessions Judge, Salem, passed in C.A.No.98 of 2008 on 12.11.2008 confirming the judgment of learned Judicial Magistrate I, Sankari, passed in C.C.No.365 of 2004 on 20.05.2008.
For Petitioner : Mr.C.Prabakaran For Respondent : Mr.N.Manokaran
*****
O R D E R
This revision arises against two concurrent judgments of Courts below
convicting petitioner for offence u/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentencing him to 1 year R.I. and fine of Rs.10,000/- i/d 3 months S.I.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the concurrent convictions and sentences imposed for cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Whether the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was rebutted by the petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Latha W/o.L.Sadhasivam
- respondent
A.Natesan S/o.Alagappan
Coram
C.T. SELVAM
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court