the wrong doings of respondents 2 to 5, petitioner preferred a complaint before respondent police but no action was taken. Upon petitioner moving this Court in Crl.O.P.No.26417 of 2014 and obtaining directions therein, a case was registered in Crime No.67 of 2014 on the file of first respondent for offences u/s.120(b), 420 and 406 IPC. On completion of investigation, first respondent has informed that respondents 2 to 5 had no intention to deceive petitioner through impersonation and fabrication of documents. Petitioner has produced only the unregistered Power of Attorney and no registered documents or revenue records have been produced to substantiate his contention. In the alleged Power of Attorney executed by second respondent, there is no mention of the subject property. While petitioner/complainant has not produced any proof to substantiate the contention that he has given a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- through cheque bearing No.772047 drawn on State Bank of India, Adyar Branch, second respondent, has stated that he has received a sum of Rs.2,75,000/- from the petitioner/complainant. Given such position, it was clear that there was real estate business dealings between complainant and second respondent and money transactions in connection therewith. In the unregistered sale deed, no value was fixed for the property in Survey No.135/1, new Survey No.347/13. Though complainant pleaded that all documents pertaining to the subject property are with him, it was found that such documents are with fifth respondent. It was also found that second respondent having received a sum of Rs.6,50,000/- from petitioner/complainant towards sale consideration in respect of properties in (i) http://www.judis.nic.in S.No.135/1, New S.No.347/13, (ii) S.No.108/15 and (iii) S.No.80/10A, has executed
