Disposed

Mr.J.Ragunathan, Aged 38 Years v. Mrs.Aruna

Madras HC5 Apr 2017CRL RC/413/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a criminal revision challenging an order of interim maintenance. The trial court's order to the husband was stayed subject to payment of arrears. The Court directed the trial court to conclude the maintenance trial by 24.06.2017 and continued interim payments.

What did the court decide?

The trial was directed to be concluded on or before 24.06.2017. Petitioner directed to pay interim maintenance of Rs.3,000/- per month without default.

Mr.J.Ragunathan, Aged 38 Years Vs Mrs.Aruna — Maintenance and Alimony | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 05.04.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN

¶5

Crl.R.C.No.413 of 2017 & Crl.M.P.No.3880 of 2017

¶6

Mr.J.Ragunathan ... Petitioner

¶7

Vs.

¶8

1.Mrs.Aruna

¶9

2.R.Kanishka (minor) Reply her mother Aruna ... Respondents

¶10

Prayer : Criminal Revision petition filed under Section 397 and 401 of Criminal Procedure Code praying that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to set aside the order made in M.P.No.187 of 2016 in M.C.No.252 of 2015 on the file of the Principal Family Court at Chennai, on 08.02.2017.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mrs.G.Muthu For Respondents : Mr.B.Sundar ORDER

¶12

The present revision has been filed against the order of interim maintenance granted to the respondents herein. The Court below had directed the petitioner herien to pay maintenance at the rate of Rs.3,000/- per month each to the respondents herein. Challenging the said order, the revision petitioner/husband had preferred this revision.

¶13

Earlier on 14.03.2017, this Court while granting interim stay had directed the petitioner to deposit 50% of the arrears of maintenance as awarded by the Court below and also continue to pay the interim maintenance before 5th of every calender month.

¶14

Today when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner filed on memo stating that as ordered by this court, the petitioner had deposited 50% of the arrears of maintenance [i.e.Rs.36,000/-] on 03.04.2017. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

I have heard the Mrs.G.Muthu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.B.Sundar, learned counsel for the respondents.

¶16

Learned counsel for the respondents would submit that the trail had already been commenced and sought for a direction for early disposal of the maintenance case.

¶17

Taking into consideration the submissions made and the fact that the trial had already been commenced, the Court below is directed to conclude the trial on or before 24.06.2017. However, till the disposal of the maintenance case, the petitioner is directed to pay maintenance at the rate of Rs.3,000/- per month to the respondents without any default.

¶18

With the above observation, this Criminal Revision Case is disposed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions is closed.

¶19

Sd/ASST. REGISTRAR /TRUE COPY/ SUB ASST. REGISTRAR To 1.The Judge, Principal Family Court, Chennai.

¶20

Crl.R.C.No.413 of 2017

¶21

EV(CO) RRI(18/04/2017)

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Mr.J.Ragunathan, Aged 38 Years v. Mrs.Aruna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr.J.Ragunathan, Aged 38 Years v. Mrs.Aruna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

J.Prem Kumar, M/A-32 Years Vs Mrs.Sandhya, F/A-28 Years

P.Kesavan Vs v.Sunil

M.Rajendran, M/a 59 Years, Vs T.Mani @ Subramani, M/a 46 Yrs

Palanisamy Vs S.N.Sarojini

Thilagavathy Vs the Inspector of Police

A.Ravi Vs C.Usha