Palanisamy v. S.N.Sarojini
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court dismissed the Criminal Revision as infructuous because the main maintenance case was already disposed. Connected M.P. closed.
What did the court decide?
Criminal Revision dismissed; connected M.P. closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05.04.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
Crl.R.C.No.245 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014
Palanisamy ... Appellant/Respondent vs Mrs.S.N.Sarojini ... Respondent/Petitioner Criminal Revision Case filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to set aside the order made in C.M.P.No.289 of 2013 in M.C.No.5 of 2013 on the file of the Family Court, Coimbatore. For Petitioner : M/s.Thenmozhi Shiva Perumal For Respondent : ---O R D E R
Since the above Criminal Revision Case has been filed against the order of interim maintenance and now the main case itself has been disposed off challenging the same, the petitioner has filed another criminal revision case. Hence, the present Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected M.P. is closed.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS VI) //True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Palanisamy
- respondent
Mrs. S.N. Sarojini
Coram
V. BHARATHIDASAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court