G.Perumal v. K.Venu Chettiar
Case brief
What is this about?
The court disposed of the criminal revision case without substantive reasoning because the petitioner had died, based on a memo filed by his counsel.
What did the court decide?
Disposal of the criminal revision case on the death of the petitioner.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 04.08.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
Crl.R.C.No.1183 of 2012
G.Perumal ... Petitioner/Accused
.. Vs ..
K.Venu Chettiar ... Respondent/Complainant
PRAYER: Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 r/w. 401 of Cr.P.C., against the judgment passed by the First Additional District and Sessions Judge at Tindivanam in C.A.No.24 of 2012, dated 07.09.2012 confirming the judgment of conviction passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate-II, Tindivanam in C.C.No.82 of 2006, dated 08.03.2012.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Prabhakaran For Respondent : Mr.B.Gurunathan - - - - -
2
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
G.Perumal
- respondent
K.Venu Chettiar
Coram
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court