Petitioners sought withdrawal of a petition filed under Section 482 CrPC to quash an FIR. Permission to withdraw was granted, and the connected Criminal Original Petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the petition was granted; the Criminal Original Petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.06.2017 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH
CRL.O.P.(MD)No.7320 of 2017 and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.4981 of 2017
1.Perumal
2.Selvam : Petitioners/ Accused No.1 and 2
-Vs-
(Crime No.149 of 2017)
: 1st Respondent/Complainant
2.Kanirajan : 2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant
PRAYER: Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code to call for the records pertaining to the First Information Report in Crime No.149 of 2017 on the file of the first respondent Police Station and quash the same as illegal.
For Petitioners : Mr.R.Karunanithi For Respondents : Mr.K.Anbarasan, Government Advocate (Crl.side) For R1
Mr.K.R.Laxman For R2
******* O R D E R
When this Court was about to dismiss this petition on merits, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-III)
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ /True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
2
To
+1cc to Mr.R.Karunanithi, Advocate Sr.No.60637 +1cc to Mr.K.R. Laxman, Advocate Sr.No.60645
RMK/SSL
VB/GT/SAR3/27.06.2017/2P/5C
CRL.O.P.(MD)No.7320 of 2017
16.06.2017
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Perumal
Selvam
The State Represented through The Inspector of Police, Usilampatti Town Police Station, Madurai District
Kanirajan
P.N.PRAKASH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
