The petitioner sought directions to prevent police interference in a civil dispute between him and Amanullah, arising from a closed police complaint. The High Court, noting the complaint was closed, closed the petition without substantive analysis or orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 15.06.2017
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH
Crl.O.P.(MD) No.1337 of 2017 and Crl.M.P.(MD) No.1140 of 2017
Singaravelu @ Singaraj ... Petitioner
-vs-
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Suriya Narayanan
For R1 to R4 : Mr.K.Anbarasan Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side) *****
O R D E R
This petition has been filed to direct the 1st respondent to give suitable instruction to the respondents 2 to 4 not to interfere in the civil dispute between the petitioner and 5th https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ respondent.
2
Assistant Registrar(Records)
/True copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To:
Ar
AE/SKN RSK/SAR3/29.06.2017/2P/6C
Crl.O.P.(MD) No.1337 of 2017 15.06.2017
Singaravelu @ Singaraj
The Superintendent of Police, Theni
The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Bodi
The Inspector of Police, Thevaram
The Sub-Inspector of Police, Kombai
Amanullah
P.N.Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
