Allowed

M.Mani, v. the Senior Intelligence

Madras HC19 Jun 2017CRL OP(MD)/6917/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment relaxes the bail condition imposed on three petitioners arrested for offences under the Customs Act. The court modified the requirement to report once every fifteen days as the investigation was completed, ordering them to report only when required for interrogation.

What did the court decide?

The earlier condition imposed on the petitioners is relaxed and they shall report before the Investigating Officer as and when required for interrogation.

M.Mani, Vs the Senior Intelligence — Company and Corporate | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 19.06.2017

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN

¶6

Crl.O.P(MD).No.6917 of 2017

¶7

1)M.Mani 2)Abdul Rahuman 3)K.Keyton Kumar ...Petitioners

¶8

Vs.

¶9

The State rep., by the Senior Intelligence Officer, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, No.22/14, Roche Colony, South Beach Road, Tuticorin. ...Respondent

¶10

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to relax the condition to report and sign before the respondent on 1^st and 15^th of every Month at 10 a.m., imposed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai in Cr.M.P.No.1240/16, dated 16.12.2016.

¶11

For Petitioners : Mr.M.Seenisulthan For Respondent : Mr.C.Arul Vadivel @ Sekar, Special Public Prosecutor for DRI Cases.

¶12

ORDER

¶13

This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to relax the bail condition imposed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai in Cr.M.P.No.1240 of 2016 dated 16.12.2016.

¶14

Heard Mr.M.Seenisulthan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.C.Arul Vadivel @ Sekar, learned Special Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent.

¶15

The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners, who were arrested for the offences punishable under Section 135(c)r/w 135(1)(c) of the Customs Act,1962, were granted bail by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai, in Crl.M.P.Nos.1043, 1093 & 1121 of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2016, dated 27.10.2016, with condition to report before the respondent Police daily at 10 a.m., until further orders.

¶16

¶17

Thereafter the condition was modified in Cr.M.P.No.1166 of 2016, dated 17.11.2016, as to report before the respondent Police once in a week i.e., Every Monday, which is further modified in Cr.M.P.No.1240 of 2016, dated 16.12.2016, as to report before the respondent Police once in fifteen days.

¶18

The learned Special Public Prosecutor submitted that investigation in this case is completed and the presence of the accused/petitioners is no more required for investigation.

¶19

Recording the same, the earlier condition imposed on the petitioners is relaxed and the petitioners shall report before the Investigating Officer as and when required for interrogation. This petition is ordered accordingly.

¶20

Sd/-

¶21

Assistant Registrar(Records)

¶22

/True Copy/

¶23

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶24

¶25

1. The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai.

¶26

1. The Senior Intelligence Officer, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, No.22/14, Roche Colony,

¶27

South Beach Road, Tuticorin.

¶28

+1cc to Mr.C.Arul Vadivel @ Sekar, Advocate Sr.No.60751

¶29

¶30

VB/JC/SAR2/28.06.2017/2P/4C

¶31

Crl.O.P(MD).No.6917 of 2017 19.06.2017

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Mani, v. the Senior Intelligence

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Mani, v. the Senior Intelligence

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Thangam Vs P.Nallamuthu

K.Palanichamy Vs K.Mohammed Nizar

Periyakaruppan, Vs the Inspector of Police

Arulraj @ Aruna Vs the Inspector of Police

Muthu, Vs the Inspector of Police

A.v.Sundaramoorthy Vs the Inspector of Police