Allowed

S.Mandhiram v. the Superintendent of Police

Madras HC12 Jul 2017CRL OP(MD)/5056/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a criminal original petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking direction to police to expedite investigation and file charge sheet. Court recorded police assurance to complete within four months and directed same accordingly allowing petition.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondent police to expedite investigation in Crime No.17 of 2016 and file charge sheet within four months.

S.Mandhiram Vs the Superintendent of Police — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 12.07.2017

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR

¶6

Crl.O.P.(MD) No.5056 of 2017

S.Mandhiram

... Petitioner

-Vs-

State Represented by 1.The Superintendent of Police, Tuticorin, Tuticorin District.

¶11

2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, ALGSC, Tuticorin, Tuticorin District. ...Respondents

¶12

Prayer: Criminal Original petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the respondent police to expedite the investigation in connection with Crime No.17 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police and file the charge sheet within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Senthil Sankara Nathakumar For Respondents : Mr.K.Anbarasan, Government Advocate(Crl.side).

¶14

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

This Criminal Original petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondent police to expedite the investigation in connection with Crime No.17 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police and file charge sheet within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶17

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate(Criminal side) appearing for the respondents.

¶18

The learned Government Advocate(Criminal side) on instructions submitted that the investigation will be completed and the charge sheet will be filed within four months.

¶19

Recording the statement of the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side), this Court direct the respondent police to expedite the investigation in Crime No.17 of 2016 and to file charge sheet within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶20

Accordingly, the Criminal Original petition is allowed. Sd/-

¶21

Assistant Registrar(CS-I)

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶23

/True Copy/

¶24

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶25

¶26

¶27

1.The Superintendent of Police, Tuticorin, Tuticorin District.

¶28

2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, ALGSC, Tuticorin, Tuticorin District.

¶29

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶30

PMU

¶31

JS/SV/SAR.1/21.07.2017/2P-4C

¶32

Crl.O.P.(MD) No.5056 of 2017 12.07.2017

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Mandhiram v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Mandhiram v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.K.S.V.T. Subburaj Vs the Inspector of Police

D.Sureshkumar, Vs the Inspector of Police

N.S.Kalirajan Vs the Superintendent of Police

V.Kavitha Vs the Inspector of Police

P.Krishnamoorthy@Babu Vs the Inspector of Police

A.Manikandan Vs the Sub Inspector of Police