Disposed

P.Sekar, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC18 Apr 2017CRL MP(MD)/2982/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous petition, the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court relaxed a bail condition imposed on the petitioner, directing him to appear when summoned, noting that investigation was complete and the charge sheet was filed.

What did the court decide?

The condition imposed on the petitioner was relaxed; he shall appear before the concerned court on receipt of summons.

P.Sekar, Vs the Inspector of Police — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Tuesday, the Eighteenth day of April Two Thousand Seventeen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU

¶5

CRL MP(MD) No.2982 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) No.20437 of 2016

¶6

P.SEKAR ... PETITIONER/PETITIONER/PETITIONER

¶7

¶8

THE STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOLLIDAM POLICE STAION, TRICHY DISTRICT.

¶9

CRIME NO.395 OF 2016 ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶10

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed in Crl.M.P.(MD)No.212 of 2017 in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.20437 of 2016 dated 10.01.2017 and thus render justice.

¶11

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.B.JAMMEL ARASU, Advocate for the petitioner and of MRS.S.PRABHA, Government Advocate (criminal side), on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶12

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the respondent.

¶13

According to the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), the petitioner is complying with the condition imposed by https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ this Court regularly. She further submitted that in this case, investigation was completed and charge sheet was filed and the same

¶14

is yet to be taken on file by the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned.

¶15

Considering above said facts, the condition imposed on the petitioner is relaxed. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Court on receipt of summons.

¶16

sd/18/04/2017

¶17

/ TRUE COPY /

¶18

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO

¶19

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.IV,TRICHY.

¶20

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY

¶21

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOLLIDAM POLICE STAION, TRICHY DISTRICT.

¶22

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶23

+1. C.C. to M/S.B.JAMMEL ARASU Advocate SR.No.20434

¶24

CSL/BS/SAR-III/20.04.2017 : 2P/6C

¶25

ORDER

¶26

IN CRL MP(MD) No.2982 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) No.20437 of 2016 Date :18/04/2017

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P.Sekar, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Sekar, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sivabalan Vs the Inspector of Police

Arockiya Amalraj Vs the Inspector of Police

A.Suresh Vs the Inspector of Police

J.Mohammed Asarudeen, Vs the Inspector of Police

G.Radhakrishnan Vs the Inspector of Police

Ramalingam Vs the Inspector of Police