Disposed

Tmt. Latha Prabakar, v. Inspector of Police

Madras HC13 Jun 2017CRL OP/8094/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this Criminal Original Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner sought direction for completing investigation in a pending FIR. The High Court directed the respondent to investigate and file a final report as expeditiously as possible within six weeks, then disposed of the proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondent to investigate Crime No.47/2015 and file a final report within six weeks from the date of receipt of the order.

Tmt. Latha Prabakar, Vs Inspector of Police — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 13.06.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.8094 of 2017

¶6

Latha Prabakar ... Petitioner

¶7

¶8

State represented by The Inspector of Police, Special Cell for Prevention of Land Grabbing Coimbatore District. ... Respondent

¶9

Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to direct the respondent to complete the investigation in FIR No.47/2015 and to file a final report before the jurisdictional court within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.T.K.M.Saikrishnan For Respondent : Mr.C.Emalias, APP

¶11

ORDER

¶12

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent to complete the investigation in FIR No.47 of 2015 and file a final report before the jurisdictional court within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court.

¶13

The case of the petitioner is that she has lodged a complaint dated 23.05.2012 against one Meenakshi Sundaram and others before the Commissioner of Police, Coimbatore, who, in turn, forwarded the same to the respondent herein. The said complaint was registered as FIR in Crime No.47 of 2015 for the offences punishable under sections 120(B), 419, 465, 468, 471, 420 and 506(i) IPC, as per the direction of this Court dated 06.05.2015 made in Crl.O.P.No.11521 of 2015, which was filed by the petitioner. Thereafter, no progress was made in the said FIR. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, who took notice for the respondent.

¶16

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court directs the respondent to investigate the case in Crime No.47/2015 pending on his file and file a final report, if not filed earlier, as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

¶17

Sd/-
Asst.Registrar (CS VI)
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
To
1.The Inspector of Police,
Special Cell for Prevention of Land Grabbing
Coimbatore District.
2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
Crl.O.P.No.8094 of 2017
sk(co)
ss(23/6/2017)

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Tmt. Latha Prabakar, v. Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tmt. Latha Prabakar, v. Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrs.Devi, Vs Dr. Kanchana Kamalanathan

D.Sundarajan, Aged 67 Years, Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

R.Nagarajan, 37 Vs Mr.S.D.Ansar Feroz

K.Murugapandian, (M/29) Vs the State Rep.by

S. Raja, Age 37 Years, Vs D. Malathi, Age 26 Years

Tmt.Kasthuri, 38 Years Vs the State of Tamil Nadu