Dismissed

Tmt.Kasthuri, 38 Years v. the State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC13 Jun 2017CRL OP/16960/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed a Criminal Original Petition under Section 482 CrPC. The petitioner moved to withdraw the petition and was granted liberty to challenge the status report. The court dismissed the main petition and a connected miscellaneous petition accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Original Petition and connected miscellaneous petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to challenge the status report.

Tmt.Kasthuri, 38 Years Vs the State of Tamil Nadu — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 13.06.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.16960 of 2016

¶6

and

¶7

Crl.M.P.No.8147 of 2016

¶8

Kasthuri .. Petitioner
Vs
1. The State of Tamil Nadu
represented by its Secretary,
Home Department,
Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.

¶9

The District Superintendent of Police,
Cuddalore District, Cuddalore.
3. The Inspector of Police,
Ramanatham Police Station,
Cuddalore District. .. Respondents

¶10

Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the respondents to transfer the investigation in Crime No.213 of 2016 dated 22.07.2016 on the file of the third respondent herein to any other independent Agency CBCID, Cuddalore, to secure the ends of justice.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.J. Duthil Marshall

¶12

For Respondent : Mr.C.Emalias,

¶13

Additional Public Prosecutor

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

When this Criminal Original Petition was taken up, status report was filed by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.

¶16

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he is not agreeing with the reasons stated in the status report. He also submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw this Criminal Original Petition granting liberty to challenge the status report in the manner known to law. An endorsement has

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

also been made to that effect.

¶19

3.In view of the above submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, granting such liberty to the petitioner. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.

¶20

-s/dAssistant Registrar(J)

¶21

True Copy

¶22

Sub-Assistant Registrar
KM
To
1. The Secretary to Government,
Government of Tamil Nadu,
Home Department,
Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.
2. The District Superintendent of Police,
Cuddalore District, Cuddalore.
3. The Inspector of Police,
Ramanatham Police Station,
Cuddalore District.
4. The Public Prosecutor,
Madras High Court,
Chennai-600 104.
+1 CC to M/s. J. Duthil Marshall, Advocate sr 41643
+1 CC to M/s. J. Duthil Marshall, Advocate sr 41643(04/07/2017)

¶23

Crl.O.P.No.16960 of 2016 and Crl.M.P.No.8147 of 2016

¶24

MP(CO) sp/23/6

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Tmt.Kasthuri, 38 Years v. the State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tmt.Kasthuri, 38 Years v. the State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrs.Devi, Vs Dr. Kanchana Kamalanathan

D.Sundarajan, Aged 67 Years, Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

R.Nagarajan, 37 Vs Mr.S.D.Ansar Feroz

K.Murugapandian, (M/29) Vs the State Rep.by

S. Raja, Age 37 Years, Vs D. Malathi, Age 26 Years

Moovendan, Aged 22 Years, Vs State Rep. by