Disposed

V. Suganthi, 44 Yrs, v. the Commissioner of Police

Madras HC13 Jun 2017CRL OP/7749/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras transferred a criminal case from the W-35 All Women Police Station to the Cyber Crime Wing for investigation upon the Additional Public Prosecutor's submission that the Cyber Crime Wing was the appropriate authority. The petition was subsequently disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Direction to transfer the investigation of Crime No.10 of 2016 from the second respondent to the third respondent.

V. Suganthi, 44 Yrs, Vs the Commissioner of Police — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED 13.06.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN

¶5

Crl.O.P. No.7749 of 2017

¶6

V.Suganthi .. Petitioner

¶7

versus
1. The Commissioner of Police,
Vepery, Chennai.
2. The Inspector of Police,
W-35, All Women Police Station,
Tambaram, Chennai.
3. The Inspector of Police,
Cyber Crime Wing, Chennai. .. Respondents
PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482
Cr.P.C. to direct the first respondent withdraw the case in
Crime No.10 of 2016 on the file of the second respondent and to
transfer the same to the third respondent for proper
investigation.

¶8

For Petitioner : Ms.K.Anushiya
For Respondents : Mr.C.Emalias
Additional Public Prosecutor

¶9

The present Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the first respondent to withdraw the case in Crime No.10 of 2016 on the file of the second respondent and to transfer the same to the third respondent for proper investigation.

¶10

Today, when the matter was taken up for consideration, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents submitted that the third respondent is the appropriate authority to investigate the case pending in Crime No.10 of 2016.

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

The above statement made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor is recorded and the investigation in Crime No.10 of 2016 pending on the file of the second respondent is directed to transfer the same to the file of the third respondent, who shall conduct investigation and file a report, as expeditiously as possible.

¶13

With the above direction, the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

¶14

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CCC)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
sri
To
1. The Commissioner of Police,
Vepery, Chennai.
2. The Inspector of Police,
W-35, All Women Police Station,
Tambaram, Chennai.
3. The Inspector of Police,
Cyber Crime Wing,
Chennai.
4. The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.

¶15

+1cc to Ms.K.Anushiya, Advocate, S.R.No.42011

¶16

Crl.O.P. No.7749 of 2017 AD(CO) CS/19/06/17

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

V. Suganthi, 44 Yrs, v. the Commissioner of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V. Suganthi, 44 Yrs, v. the Commissioner of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrs.Devi, Vs Dr. Kanchana Kamalanathan

D.Sundarajan, Aged 67 Years, Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

R.Nagarajan, 37 Vs Mr.S.D.Ansar Feroz

K.Murugapandian, (M/29) Vs the State Rep.by

S. Raja, Age 37 Years, Vs D. Malathi, Age 26 Years

Tmt.Kasthuri, 38 Years Vs the State of Tamil Nadu