The High Court of Madras granted bail to an accused facing murder charges. The court imposed conditions regarding sureties, appearance, non-attestation of evidence, and travel restrictions, directing the trial court to proceed expeditiously.
Petitioner was ordered released on bail by executing a bond with two sureties and complying with specified conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Eighteenth day of April Two Thousand Seventeen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice S. VAIDYANATHAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.7171 of 2017
UMARANI, [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]
Vs
STATE BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KAMANAICKENPALAYAM POLICE STATION, TIRUPPUR DISTRICT CR.NO.199 OF 2016.
For Petitioner : MR.A.THYAGARAJAN FOR M/S.T.BALAJI Advocate
For Respondent : MR.P/MUTHUKUMAR, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR BAIL 439 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 28.04.2016 for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 452, 324, 294(b) and 307 I.P.C., altered to Sections 147, 148, 452, 324, 294(b), 307 and 302 I.P.C. r/w 120-B I.P.C. on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
(i) the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/(Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistratre, Palladam;
(ii) the petitioner is directed to appear before the trial Court on all hearing dates;
(iii) the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during trial;
(iv) the petitioner shall not abscond either during trial;
(v) the petitioner shall not leave Tamil Nadu without the prior permission of the Court below;
(vi) the petitioner shall give full address with contact cell number, before the Court below and the same shall not be changed till the criminal case comes to a logical conclusion;
(vii) the petitioner shall always keep the cell phone in switchon position;
proceed with the trial on day-to-day basis without adjourning the matter beyond 15 days at any point of time and complete the trial as expeditiously as possible.
This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104. TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PALLADAM
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUPPUR[FOR INFORMATION]
3 THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT,TIRUPUR
4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
5 STATE BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KAMANAICKENPALAYAM POLICE STATION, TIRUPPUR DISTRICT
6 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON FOR WOMEN, COMBATORE +1 CC to M/S.T.BALAJI Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO. 6979
Date :18/04/2017 RD 18/04/2017
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail in a case involving offences of murder and attempt to murder.
Whether the petitioner should be released on bail subject to specific conditions.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
P.K. Shaji Vs. State of KeralaReferred¶28
P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala (AIR 2005 SCW 5560) · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
UMARANI
STATE
S. VAIDYANATHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
