V.Kannan, v. Mr.Satyabrata Sahoo
Case brief
What is this about?
The Contempt Petitioner filed a petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondent for disobeying an order. The Learned Government Advocate submitted that the order was complied with on 13.04.2017, leading to the closure of the Contempt Petition.
What did the court decide?
Contempt Petition closed due to compliance with the impugned order.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 17.04.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
Cont.P.No.2035 of 2016
V.Kannan
.. Petitioner
Mr.Satyabrata Sahoo, The Transport Commissioner, O/o Transport Commissioner, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005.
Vs.
.. Respondent
Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the
Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondent for not obeying the order dated 08.09.2014 made in W.P.No.17449 of 2012 passed by this Court.
For petitioner : Mr.G.Ethirajulu
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent has complied with this Court's order dated 08.09.2014 to quash the contempt proceedings.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V. Kannan
- respondent
The Transport Commissioner
Coram
S. Vaidyanathan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court