Manikandan @ Dhadha Manikandan v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras granted bail to the petitioner accused in Crime No.629 of 2016 involving serious offences including explosives and attempted murder. The court noted the petitioner's ailment and lack of direct evidence against him regarding the explosion, noting non-production of the case diary, but set conditions for release on a bond.
What did the court decide?
The petitioner was released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.10,000 with two sureties for a like sum and by undertaking to report before the Court daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Nineteenth day of January Two Thousand Seventeen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Ms. Justice R.MALA
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.501 of 2017
MANIKANDAN @ DHADHA MANIKANDAN [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]
Vs
STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KOTTAKUPPAM POLICE STATION, VILLUPURAM DISTRICT. CR.NO.629 OF 2016.
For Petitioner : M/S.K.GANDHI KUMAR Advocate
For Respondent : MR.B.RAMESH BABU, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR BAIL 439 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner accused in a serious case involving explosives and attempts to murder, considering his antecedents and lack of direct evidence implicating him in the e
Whether the petitioner's physical ailment warrants granting bail on humanitarian grounds despite the nature of charges.
Whether the production of the case diary, which was not forthcoming, affects the decision to grant bail.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Manikandan @ Dhadha Manikandan
- respondent
State Rep by the Station House Officer, Kottakkuppam Police Station, Villupuram District
Coram
R MALA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court