Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Ms.Logoriya, Vs the State Rep. by — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2017)

Home
Madras HC
2017
Ms.Logoriya, Vs the State Rep. byMs.Logoriya, v. the State Rep. by

Dismissed

Ms.Logoriya, v. the State Rep. by

Madras HC28 Jun 2017CRL OP/2155/2017

Case brief

from the order text

What is this about?

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :…

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 28.06.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN

Crl.O.P.Nos.2155 to 2158 of 2017 and Crl.M.P.Nos.7582 to 7585 of 2017

1.Ms.Ligoriya .. Petitioner /Defacto Complainant in Crl.O.P.No.2155 of 2017

2.G.Geetha .. Petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.2156 of 2017 3.Vijaya .. Petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.2157 of 2017 4.Aruna .. Petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.2158 of 2017 Vs

1. The State Represented by Director General of Police, Dr. Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004. 2. The Additional Director General of Police, EOW, Guindy, Chennai. 3. The Commissioner of Police, Vepery, Chennai. 4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Economic Offence Wing, Team-II, Chennai. 5. The Inspector of Police, Economic Offence Wing, Team-II, Chennai.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/s. Aphro Trust, Represented by its Proprietor I.P. Yessudoss 27/49, 5^th Layout, Teachers Colony, Kolathur, Chennai-600 099.

Statutes considered

1 provisions across 1 enactments

AI extract

Criminal Procedure Code482

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Ms. Ligoriya
petitioner
G. Geetha
petitioner
Vijaya
petitioner
Aruna
respondent
The State Represented by Director General of Police
respondent

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 28 Jun 2017 · June
Registered: 31 Jan 2017
Case no.: CRL OP/2155/2017

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from R. Mahadevan

N.Sathish Vs K.Shanmugam IAS
27 Jun 2017
M/S.South India Road Milk Vs the State of Tamil Nadu
27 Jun 2017
M.K.Balasubramaniam Vs Manirathinam
27 Jun 2017
Shri Lalit Kumar Purva, Vs the State of Tamil Nadu
28 Jun 2017

Cite this judgement

Ms.Logoriya, v. the State Rep. by, CRL OP/2155/2017 (MAD), decided on 28 June 2017.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Statutes1

Criminal Procedure Code482

View all statutes

Bench / Coram

R. Mahadevan

Parties & counsel

Dismissed

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

M/s I.P.E.E Enterprises Represented by its Proprietor I.P. Yessudoss

I.P.Yessudoss, Founder of Aphro Trust, 27/49, 5^th Layout, Teachers Colony, Kolathur, Chennai-600 099.

Chennai Manakaratchi Reporter, Represented by its Proprietor 27/49, 5^th Layout, Teachers Colony, Kolathur, Chennai-600 099. 10.Mrs.Devi .. Respondents in Crl.O.P.Nos.2155 to 2158 of 2017 Prayer in Crl.O.P.Nos.2155 to 2158 of 2017:

Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to appoint an settlement commissioner to disburse the amount of the 6^th to 10^th respondents lying in various banks to the each victims who are all entitle and eligible to get back their amount and to sell the moveable and immovable properties which belongs to 6^th to 10^th respondents by way of conducting public auction.

For Petitioners : Mr.R.Muniyapparaj For R.1 to R.5 : Mr.C. Emalias Addl. Public Prosecutor

For 8^th Respondent :I.P.Yesudoss Party-in-person

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

COMMON O R D E R

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners seek permission of this Court to withdraw the petitions. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2.Permission is granted. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the criminal original petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
sr
To
1. The Director General of Police,
Dr. Radhakrishnan Salai,
Mylapore,
Chennai-600 004.
2. The Additional Director General of Police,
EOW, Guindy,
Chennai.
3. The Commissioner of Police,
Vepery, Chennai.
4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
Economic Offence Wing,
Team-II,
Chennai.
5. The Inspector of Police,
Economic Offence Wing,
Team-II,
Chennai.
6. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras
+1cc to Mr.I.P.Yesudoss, Advocate SR.No.44892
Crl.O.P.Nos.2155 to 2158 of 2017
RV(CO)
GN(07/07/2017)

Crl.O.P.Nos.2155 to 2158 of 2017

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/s Aphro Trust

Coram

AI extract

R. Mahadevan

CNR

HCMA010450442017

Topic

Civil Procedure and Limitation

Bench

Disposal

WITHDRAWN DISMISSED

C. Muthukumaran, 31 Yrs, Vs the Superintendent of Police

28 Jun 2017

Rajkumar, Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

28 Jun 2017