Criminal Original Petitions filed to quash criminal complaints were dismissed by this court as withdrawn, following an endorsement by petitioners' counsel.
Petitions dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 02.08.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
Crl.O.P Nos.18454 of 2013 to 18457 of 2013
and
M.P.Nos.1,1,1 of 2013
1.T.Sridhar
2.P.Elangovan
3.K.Veerasundaram ....Petitioners in all Crl.O.Ps
..Vs..
State by
The Inspector of Police,
CCIW CID, Cuddalore,
Cuddalore District.
Cr.No.6 of 2010 ...Respondent in all Crl.O.Ps
Prayer in Crl.O.P.No.18454 of 2013:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the entire records concerned in C.C.No.61 of 2011 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate-I, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District and quash the same in so far as the petitioners are concerned.
Prayer in Crl.O.P.No.18455 of 2013:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the entire records concerned in C.C.No.62 of 2011 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate-I, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District and quash the same in so far as the petitioners are concerned.
Prayer in Crl.O.P.No.18456 of 2013:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the entire records concerned in C.C.No.63 of 2011 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate-I, Cuddalore, http://www.judis.nic.in
2
Cuddalore District and quash the same in so far as the petitioners are concerned.
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN,J.,
nvi
Prayer in Crl.O.P.No.18457 of 2013:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the entire records concerned in C.C.No.64 of 2011 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate-I, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District and quash the same in so far as the petitioners are concerned.
For Petitioners :Mr.C.Prakasam in all Crl.O.Ps
For Respondent :Mr.B.Ramesh Babu,
Govt.Advocate (crl.side)
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this
Court to withdraw these petitions and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.In view of the above endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, these petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
02.08.2017
To
1.The Inspector of Police, http://www.judis.nic.in CCIW CID, Cuddalore,
3
Cuddalore District. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
Crl.O.P Nos.18454 of 2013 to 18457 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1,1,1 of 2013
T.Sridhar, P.Elangovan, K.Veerasundaram
State representing The Inspector of Police, CCIW CID, Cuddalore
RMT. TEEKAA RAMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
