Partly allowed

Alagar v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC9 Mar 2017CRL MP(MD)/1716/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Four petitions seeking to condone absence from reporting to the Judicial Magistrate and to relax bail conditions. The Court condoned absence upon payment of costs to the Legal Services Authority but dismissed the relaxation petitions, directing petitioners to resume reporting per earlier bail conditions.

What did the court decide?

Condonation of absence granted upon payment of cost; relaxation of bail conditions dismissed with direction to report as per earlier order.

Alagar Vs the Inspector of Police — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Thursday, the Ninth day of March Two Thousand Seventeen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Dr.Justice G.JAYACHANDRAN

¶5

CRL MP(MD) No.1716 to 1719 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) Nos.23094 and 23098 of 2016

¶6

ALAGAR ... PETITIONER / PETITIONER in

¶7

CRL.MP(MD) No.1716 of 2017 in CRL OP(MD)No.23094 of 2016 PONRAM ... PETITIONER / PETITIONER in CRL.MP(MD) No.1717 of 2017 in CRL OP(MD)No.23098 of 2016 MADHAVAN ... PETITIONER / PETITIONER in CRL.MP(MD) No.1718 of 2017 in CRL OP(MD)No.23098 of 2016 GURUSAMY ... PETITIONER / PETITIONER in CRL.MP(MD) No.1719 of 2017 in CRL OP(MD)No.23094 of 2016

¶8

¶9

STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VIRUDHUNGAR WEST POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNGAR DISTRICT (CRIME NO.804 OF 2016) ... RESPONDENT / RESPONDENT IN ALL THE PETITIONS

¶10

Prayer in CRL MP(MD). 1716/ 2017 in CRL OP(MD)No.23094 of 2016:

¶11

To condone the absence of the petitioner in respect of the condition imposed in the order dated 08.12.2016 made in Crl.O.P.No.23094 of 2016 on the file of this Honourable Court

¶12

Prayer in CRL MP(MD). 1717/ 2017 in CRL OP(MD)No.23098 of 2016:

¶13

To condone the absence in respect of the condition imposed in the order dated 08.12.2016 made in Crl.O.P.No.23098 of 2016 on the file of this Honourable Court

¶14

Prayer in CRL MP(MD). 1718/ 2017 in CRL OP(MD)No.23098 of 2016:

¶15

To condone the absence in respect of the condition imposed https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ in the order dated 08.12.2016 made in Crl.O.P.No. 23098 of 2016 on the file of the Honourable Court

¶16

Prayer in CRL MP(MD). 1719/ 2017 in CRL OP(MD)No.23094 of 2016:

¶17

To condone the absence in respect of the condition imposed in the order dated 08.12.2016 made in Crl.O.P.No.23094 of 2016 on the file of this Honourable Court

¶18

Order : These petitions coming on for orders upon perusing the petitions filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.R.GANDHI, Advocate for the petitioner in all the petitions and of M/S.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) on behalf of the Respondents in all the petitions the court made the following order:-

¶19

The petition for relaxing the bail condition along with the application to condone the absence of the petitioners from reporting to the learned Judicial Magistrate pursuant to the bail condition, this Court has directed the petitioners to pay cost to the High Court Legal Services Authority, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai, in order to condone the absence.

¶20

2. Heard both sides.

¶21

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners in all petitions submitted that pursuant to the direction of this Court, cost has been paid to the High Court Legal Services Authority. Therefore the absence of these petitioners from reporting to the learned Judicial Magistrate from 11.02.2017 is condoned.

¶22

4.The petitions for relaxation are dismissed. The petitioners are directed to report before the learned Judicial Magistrate as per the earlier bail condition from the date on which the order copy is made ready and liberty is given to this petitioners to revive the relaxation petition after sometime.

¶23

/ TRUE COPY /

¶24

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶25

¶26

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO 1, VIRUDHUNAGAR.

¶27

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR.

¶28

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VIRUDHUNGAR WEST POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNGAR DISTRICT.

¶29

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

¶30

+4. C.C. to M/S.R.GANDHI Advocate SR.No.13690,13692,13691,13686

¶31

ORDER IN

¶32

CRL MP(MD) No.1716 to 1719 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) Nos.23094 and 23098 of 2016

¶33

Date :09/03/2017

¶34

JM/SV MMS/SAR 3/21.03.2017/3P/9C

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Alagar v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Alagar v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Mahamani Vs the Inspector of Police

Perumalsamy, Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Dinesh Bharathi Vs the Inspector of Police

Thiyagarajan, Vs State through the

Sankaran @ Christopher Vs the Inspector of Police

Senthil Murugan Vs the Inspector of Police