Allowed

Gunasekaran v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC24 Nov 2017CRL MP(MD)/10672/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought relief to relax bail conditions imposed in a related matter. The respondent noted the petitioner's compliance over 58 days. The High Court relaxed the conditions, requiring future appearance only upon summons for interrogation.

What did the court decide?

The previously imposed condition for the applicant to appear before the police for interrogation is relaxed; appearance is now required only upon receipt of a summons.

Gunasekaran Vs the Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Friday, the Twenty Fourth day of November Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT

¶3

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI

¶4

CRL MP(MD) No.10672 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) No.9253 of 2017

¶5

GUNASEKARAN ... PETITIONER/ PETITIONER

¶6

¶7

STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, TRICHY DISTRICT. CRIME NO.7/2017

¶8

... RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT

¶9

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P(MD).No.9253 of 2017 dated 01/08/2017 on the file of this Honourable Court.

¶10

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.K.MAHALAKSHMI, Advocate for the petitioner and of M/S.K.ANBARASAN, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶11

The Petitioner filed this petition for relaxing the condition imposed by this Court for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 417, 420, 294(b), 506(i) of IPC in Crime No.7 of 2017, while granting anticipatory bail.

¶12

2.Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner.

¶13

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that the petitioner is complying with the condition regularly for a period of 58 days.

¶14

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the condition already imposed on the petitioner is relaxed and the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police, as and when required for interrogation on receipt of summons. This petition is ordered.

sd/-

24/11/2017

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶19

Madurai - 625 023.

¶20

¶21

THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.VI, TRICHY.

¶22

DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY.

¶23

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, TRICHY DISTRICT.

¶24

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶25

ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.10672 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) No.9253 of 2017 Date :24/11/2017 MS/RR/SAR.4/29.11.2017/2P.5C

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Gunasekaran v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gunasekaran v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K. Kannan Vs the Inspector of Police

Saravanan Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Santhosh Vs the Inspector of Police

Subramanian @ Mottapulla Vs the Inspector of Police

D.Tamilan @ Tamilalagan Vs the Inspector of Police

Alwar Vs the Inspector of Police