Allowed

Joe Daniel Arunkumar, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC14 Nov 2017CRL MP(MD)/10304/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court granted a petition seeking relaxation of conditions imposed on anticipatory bail. The Court relaxed the appearance condition, allowing the petitioner to appear before the police only upon receipt of a summons.

What did the court decide?

Relaxed the condition imposed on the petitioner; the petitioner shall appear before the police only as and when required for interrogation on receipt of summons.

Joe Daniel Arunkumar, Vs the Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Tuesday, the Fourteenth day of November Two Thousand Seventeen

¶3

PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI

¶4

CRL MP(MD) No.10304 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) No.3631 of 2017

¶5

JOE DANIEL ARUNKUMAR ... PETITIONER/PETITIONER/ ACCUSED-5 Vs

¶6

STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, PUDUKKOTTAI.

¶7

CRIME NO.13 OF 2016 ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT

¶8

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed by this Honourable Court in Crl.O.P (MD).No.3631/2017 dated 28/03/2017.

¶9

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.J.ANANDKUMAR, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.K.ANBARASAN, Government Advocate(Crl.Side)on behalf of the Respondents the court made the following order:-

¶10

The Petitioner filed this petition for relaxing the condition imposed by this Court for the offences punishable under Sections 465, 467, 468, 420, 471 of IPC in Crime No. 13 of 2016, while granting anticipatory bail.

¶11

2.Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner.

¶12

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that the petitioner is complying with the condition regularly for a period of five weeks. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the condition already imposed on the petitioner is relaxed and the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police, as and when required for interrogation on receipt of summons. This petition is ordered.

sd/-

14/11/2017

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶18

¶19

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ALANGUDI, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

¶20

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT

¶21

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, PUDUKKOTTAI.

¶22

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶23

+1. C.C. to M/S.J.ANANDKUMAR Advocate SR.No.34356

¶24

PK/RR/SAR-2/20.11.2017 : 2P/6C

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Joe Daniel Arunkumar, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Joe Daniel Arunkumar, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Thangam Vs the Inspector of Police

Karuppasamy Vs the Inspector of Police

Murugappan Vs the Inspector of Police

Ravindran Vs the Inspector of Police

S.M. Geetha Vs Shiyam Prakash

B. Madasamy Vs the Inspector of Police