Karuppasamy v. the Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court modified the court order requiring the petitioner to appear before the Police once a week (within the next 31 stipulated days of weekly appearances).
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Thirteenth day of November Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI
CRL MP(MD) No.10259 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) No.12449 of 2017
KARUPPASAMY ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.1
Vs THE STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE WATRAP POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT,
CRIME NO. 339/2017. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed in Crl.O.P(MD).No.12449/2017 dated 22/09/2017.
Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S. S. PRASATH, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.K.ANBARASAN Government Advocate(Crl.Side),on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-
The Petitioner filed this relaxation petition after complying the condition imposed by this Court before the respondent Police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 379, 506 (ii) & 4 of Women Harassment Act., in Crime No.339 of 2017.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the condition of appearance before the Police can be relaxed and modified.
Whether the petitioner can appear before the Police for any alternative day.
Whether there are any resources to be produced for the sake of informing of the police on the part of the complainant.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
KARUPPASAMY
- respondent
THE STATE BY. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE WATRAP POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court