Partly allowed

Sekar v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC8 Nov 2017CRL MP(MD)/10090/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court modified the bail conditions imposed on four petitioners facing trials for offences under the IPC. The court reduced the frequency of police appearance from a prior unspecified schedule to once a week on Mondays.

What did the court decide?

The petitioners shall appear before the respondent police once in a week on every Monday at 10.30 a.m.

Sekar Vs the Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Eighth day of November Two Thousand Seventeen

¶2

PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI

¶3

CRL MP(MD) No.10090 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) No.11280 of 2017

¶4

1 SEKAR 2 KANI @ KANIRAJ 3 KATTAPULI @ MADASAMY 4 RASAIAH ... PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS

¶5

¶6

STATE REPRESENTED BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MUTHAIAHPURAM POLICE STATION, MUTHAIAHPURAM, TUTICORIN DISTRICT.

¶7

(CRIME NO. 288 OF 2017) ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶8

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed by this Honourable Court order made in Crl.O.P.(MD).No. 11280 of 2017, dated 13.09.2017 on the file of this Honourable Court

¶9

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.P.BANUPRASATH, Advocate for the petitioners and of MR.K.ANBARASAN, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶10

The Petitioners filed this relaxation petition after complying the condition imposed by this Court before the respondent Police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 307 and 506(ii) of I.P.C in Crime No.288 of 2017.

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners.

¶12

3.The Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that the petitioners are regularly complying with the conditions imposed by this Court for a period of 38 days.

¶13

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the condition already imposed on the petitioners are modified to the effect that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police, once in a week i.e., on every Monday at 10.30 a.m, until further orders.

¶14

/ TRUE COPY /

¶15

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶16

¶17

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, THOOTHUKUDI

¶18

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THOOTHUKUDI

¶19

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MUTHAIAHPURAM POLICE STATION, MUTHAIAHPURAM, TUTICORIN DISTRICT.

¶20

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

¶21

+1. C.C. to M/S.P.BANUPRASATH Advocate SR.No.34164

¶22

CRL MP(MD) No.10090 of 2017 CRL OP(MD) No.11280 of 2017

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ PK/RR/SAR-4/13.11.2017 : 2P/6C

Sekar v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sekar v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Al Amin Vs Dr.Agnes

M. Shanmugaiya Alias Vs the Inspector of Police

Kannan Vs the Inspector of Police

M.Iqbal@Muniyasamy Vs the Inspector of Police

Moorthi Vs the Inspector of Police

Gopal Vs the Inspector of Police