Kannan v. the Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought relaxation of anticipatory bail conditions. Court dismissed the petition due to petitioner's non-compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Seventh day of November Two Thousand Seventeen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI
KANNAN
Vs
STATE BY
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KAYATHAR POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT CRIME NO. 299/2017. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to Relax the condition imposed by this Honourable Court dated 08.09.2017 in Crl. O. P. (MD) No. 11336/2017 and pass such other orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.A.JOSEPH JERRY, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.K.ANBARASAN, Government Advocate (Crl.side) on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-
The Petitioner filed this petition for relaxing the condition imposed by this Court for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 341, 323, 302 of IPC and 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Women Harassment Act, in Crime No.299 of 2017, while granting anticipatory bail.
2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that the petitioner is not regularly complying with the conditions imposed by this Court.
4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ considering the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), I am not inclined to relax the condition imposed this
2
Court in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.11336 of 2017, dated 08.09.2017. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed.
sd/07/11/2017 / TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.10004 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) No.11336 of 2017 Date :07/11/2017
SMA/RR/SAR-1/15.11.2017:2P/5C
Kannan
State by The Inspector of Police Kayathar Police Station
M. DHANDAPANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court