Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

A.Murugan, M/29 Yrs, Vs the State — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2017)

Home
Madras HC
2017
A.Murugan, M/29 Yrs, Vs the StateA.Murugan, M/29 Yrs, v. the State

Disposed

A.Murugan, M/29 Yrs, v. the State

Madras HC9 Jun 2017CRL MP/6811/2017

Case brief

from the order text

What is this about?

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS ( Criminal…

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Friday, the Ninth day of June Two Thousand Seventeen

PRESENT

The Hon`ble Mr Justice S. BASKARAN

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.6811 of 2017

IN CRL OP.9119/2017

1 A.MURUGAN

[ PETITIONERS ]

2 S.GUHAN

3 R.VELU

4 R.JEEVA

Vs

THE STATE REP. BY ITS INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SHEVAPET POLICE STATION, SALEM DISTRICT. CR.NO. 139 OF 2017.

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
A.Murugan
petitioner
S.Guhan
respondent
State

Coram

AI extract

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 9 Jun 2017 · June
Registered: 2 Jun 2017
Case no.: CRL MP/6811/2017

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from S. Baskaran

Suresh, 26 Yrs, Vs the Station House Officer
2 Jun 2017
J. Sekar, 49 Yrs, Vs Assistant Director
12 May 2017
Malliga, F/a 61 Yrs, Vs State Rep by Its
8 May 2017
Ajith M/19 Yrs, Vs State Rep by
9 Jun 2017

Cite this judgement

A.Murugan, M/29 Yrs, v. the State, CRL MP/6811/2017 (MAD), decided on 9 June 2017.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

S. Baskaran

Parties & counsel

Disposed

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

[ RESPONDENT ]

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein the High Court will be pleased to extent the time for two weeks in order to comply the conditions as ordered by the Hon'ble High Court by the order dated 10.05.2017 in Crl.O.P.No.9119 of 2017.

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.R.IYYAPPAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR. R.SEKAR, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

Heard.

For execution of the order dated 10.05.2017, two weeks time extension is granted from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

-sd/-

09/06/2017

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

TRUE COPY

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.III, SALEM.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SALEM [FOR INFORMATION]

3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SHEVAPET POLICE STATION, SALEM DISTRICT.

+1C.C. to M/S.R.IYYAPPAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR NO.10142

Order

in CRL MP.6811/2017 in CRL OP.9119/2017

Date :09/06/2017

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

MK:13/06/2017

S. Baskaran

CNR

HCMA010993602017

Topic

Bail and Remand

Bench

Disposal

ORDERED

Mani, Aged 68 Yrs Vs State Rep.by

9 Jun 2017

Senthil Kumar, M/a 35 Years, Vs the State Rep by Its

9 Jun 2017