Ajith M/19 Yrs, v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
Crl.MP extended time for furnishing surety granted in Crl.OP No.23905/2016.
What did the court decide?
Two weeks extension for furnishing surety.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Friday, the Ninth day of June Two Thousand Seventeen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice S. BASKARAN
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.7025 of 2017
IN CRL OP.23905/2016
AJITH
Vs
STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, UTHIRAMERUR POLICE STATION, KANCHEEPURAM DIST. CR.NO. 455 OF 2016.
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein the High Court will be pleased to extend the time for furnishing the surety on Crl.O.P.No.23905 of 2016, dated 11.11.2016.
Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.G.PUNNIAKOTI, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR. R.SEKAR, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
AJITH
- respondent
STATE
- respondent
INSPECTOR OF POLICE, UTHIRAMERUR
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court