Rani v. Mageswari IAS
Case brief
What is this about?
A contempt petition challenging non-compliance of an interim order dated 23.09.2015. The Special Government Pleader submitted that compliance had been effected and produced proceedings as proof.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed on objection that the impugned order has been complied with by the respondents.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 07.04.2017 Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M.SUNDRESH
Cont. Petition No.535 of 2017
Rani .. Petitioner
vs.
1.Mageswari, I.A.S.,
The District Collector,
Chennai District,
Chennai.
2.Devashgayam,
The Tahsildar,
Taluk Office,
Egmore - Nungambakkam
Taluk, Chennai.
.. Respondents
Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts
Act to punish the respondents for the wilful disobedience
of the order dated 23.09.2015 in W.P.No.29916 of 2015.
For Petitioner .. Mr.G.Punniakoti For Respondents .. Mr.K.V.Dhanapalan, Spl. Govt. Pleader ORDER
Alleging that the order dated 23.09.2015 passed by this Court in W.P.No.29916 of 2015 has not been complied with, the present contempt petition has been filed.
2.When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned Special Government Pleader submitted that the order of this Court has been complied with and he has also produced a copy of the proceedings in Na.Ka.No.A1/2050/2017 dated 03.04.2017.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order dated 23.09.2015 in W.P.No.29916 of 2015 has been complied with.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rani
- respondent
Mageswari I.A.S.
- respondent
Devashgayam
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court