K.Indirani v. Thiru.Govindaraju
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt petition, the petitioner sought punishment for respondents disobeying a dated order. The court noted the investigation was completed and directed the Tahsildar to retain records and send originals to the JM. With this liberty, the contempt petition was closed.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner granted liberty to approach Judicial Magistrate; contempt petition closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 05.01.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH
Contempt Petition No.3002 of 2016
K.Indirani ..Petitioner
..vs..
1. Thiru Govindaraju
The Assistant Commissioner of Police,
Madipakkam, Chennai 600 091.
2. Thiru.K.Natarjan,
Inspector of Police,
Pallikaranai Police Station,
Chennai 600 100. ..Respondents
Contempt Petition filed under Article 215 of The Constitution of India and under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, to punish the respondents herein for committing contempt of Court by wilfully and wantonly disobeying the order passed by this Court dated 14.06.2016 made in Crl.O.P.No.12036 of 2016.
For Petitioner : Mr. K.S.Kaviarasu For Respondents : Mr.C.Emalias, APP
O R D E R
This Contempt Petition has been filed to punish
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents committed contempt of court by wilfully disobeying the order dated 14.06.2016 in Crl.O.P.No.12036 of 2016.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K. Indirani
- respondent
Thiru Govindaraju
- respondent
Thiru.K.Natarjan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court