A. Vasanthi v. Rajendran
Case brief
What is this about?
A contempt petition alleging wilful disobedience of an order in a Writ Petition was dismissed. The Court held the respondent adequately complied with directions by passing a detailed order within the stipulated time.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition is dismissed; petitioner is at liberty to raise contentions in the pending writ petition.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06.02.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN
CONT.P.No.135 of 2017
A.Vasanthi
... Petitioner
Vs
1.Thiru. Rajendran
District Elementary Educational Officer,
Tiruvannamalai District,
Tiruvannamalai.
2.Thiru S.Vincent Jeyaraj
Additional Assistant Elementary Educational Officer,
Thurinjapuram Union,
Tiruvannamalai District.
...Respondents
Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents for wilfully disobeying the order passed in W.P.No.26384 of 2016 dated 28.07.2016.
For Petitioner : M/s.G.Sankaran
For Respondents : Mr.T.M.Pappiah, Special Government Pleader ORDER
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent wilfully disobeyed the order of this Court dated 28.07.2016 passed in W.P.No.26384 of 2016.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A.Vasanthi
- respondent
Thiru. Rajendran
- respondent
Thiru S.Vincent Jeyaraj
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court