Dismissed
J. Chandirasekaran v. P. Devaraj
Madras HCCONT P/114/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
In this contempt petition, the petitioner sought punishment for alleged disobedience of an order dated 13.06.2016. The Court held that since the order merely directed the respondent to consider a representation and pass appropriate orders, no contempt was attracted against the subsequent letter dated 26.09.2016.
What did the court decide?
Contempt Petition closed as no contempt was found against the order dated 13.06.2016.