Husaina Bivi v. Murugan
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act closed after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the prior order dated 21.02.2013 in W.P.No.1438 of 2006 was complied with.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 16.11.2017
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
Contempt Petition No.1285 of 2014
1.Husaina Bivi
2.Abdul Ahad
3.Abdul Muthalib
4.Safiya
5.Fathima
..Petitioners
Vs.
Mr.Murugan
Managing Director,
Dr.Ambedkar Transport Corporation,
Ayanavaram, Chennai – 23
Now Metropolitan Transport Corporation,
Pallavan House, Annasalai, Chennai – 600 002.
...Respondent
Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the
Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondent for
violating the directions issued by this Hon'ble Court in
W.P.No.1438 of 2006 dated 21.2.2013.
For Petitioners : Mr.M.Devaraj For Respondent : Mr.P.Paramasivadoss
The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioners made a submission that the order passed by this Court dated 21.02.2013 in W.P.No.1438 of 2006, has been https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
complied with.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Husaina Bivi
- petitioner
Abdul Ahad
- petitioner
Abdul Muthalib
- petitioner
Safiya
- petitioner
Fathima
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court