R.Velayutham, Vs
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt petition for willful disobedience of a prior order, the respondent's counsel undertook to settle dues. The High Court closed the petition without further adjudication, noting no monetary order was passed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 16.11.2017
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
Contempt Petition No.128 of 2014 R.Velayutham ..Petitioner Vs. 1.Ms.D.Sabitha, IAS, The Secretary to Government, Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009. 2.Thiru.V.C.Rameswara Murugan, The Director of School Education, (Higher Secondary), College Road, Chennai – 6. 3.Thiru.A.Rajamanickam, The Chief Educational Officer, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur. ...Respondents
Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents for wilfull disobedience of the order passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.29280 of 2011 dated 23.04.2012.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Singaravelan,Senior Counsel For M/s.M.Srividhya
For Respondents: Mr.K.Dhananjayan Special Government Pleader
The learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondent states that pursuant to the Judgment of the Hon'ble Full Bench of this Court passed an order in Review Application No.227 of 2015 in W.A.No.352 of
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R.Velayutham
- respondent
Ms.D.Sabitha, IAS
- respondent
V.C.Rameswara Murugan
- respondent
A.Rajamanickam
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court