M.Selvaraj v. Selvam
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt Petition filed to punish respondents for disobeying an order; closed as the responsible officer had considered the petitioner's representation.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner's representation was considered by the respondents; Contempt Petition closed.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 01.09.2017
Coram
The Hon'ble Mr.Justice M.DURAISWAMY
Contempt Petition No.1182 of 2017
M.Selvaraj ...Petitioner
Vs
1. Thiru Selvam
Revenue Divisional Officer,
Attur, Salem District.
2. Thiru.Murugaiyan,
Tahisldar, Attur Taluk, Salem District.
..Respondents
Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents herein for their willful disobedience and contempt of this Court dated 20.10.2016 made in W.P.No.36764 of 2016.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.P.Shanmugasundaram For Respondent : Mr.O.R.Mahesvaran, GA O R D E R
This Contempt Petition is filed to punish the respondents for
disobeying the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.36764 of 2016 dated 20.10.2016.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.Selvaraj
- respondent
Thiru Selvam
- respondent
Thiru.Murugaiyan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court