Petitioner filed a writ petition regarding registration documents and annulment orders, but later sought permission to withdraw the petition. The court granted permission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 29.08.2017
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
W.P.No.22036 of 2017
S.Aruchamy ... Petitioner Vs.
Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to initiate appropriate action contemplated under Section 68 of the Indian Registration Act, 1908 or any order including annulment order consistent with the Act in compliance with the Circular No.67, dated 03.11.2011 issued by the 1st respondent in respect of Document No.1643/1995 in Plot No.105 (Park Site); document Nos.5804/1992 & 2638/2005 in Plot Nos.106 (Roads); document No.268/1993 & Rectification deed No.5206/1993 in Plot No.107A (Roads); document No.5133/1993 in Plot No.107 and document No.1147/2006 in Plot No.107 (Roads), document No.755/1994 in Plot No.108 (Roads), document No.5670/1992 in Plot No.105 (Open Space) and document No.2279/1995, 1202/2004, both Nil Plot Nos. (No Construction Zone); document No.268/1993 in Plot No.107-A and 1446/2005 & 1447/2005 in Plot No.109 (No construction Zone), document No.3354/2005, 3355/2005, 3356/2005, 3357/2005, 3358/2005, 3359/2005, 3360/2005 in Plot No.109-115 (communal purpose & road portion) sold out by the 4th respondent registered by the 3rd respondent concerning in DTCP approved Layout Plan LPDM No.35/1968 and according to revised plan of LP (DTCP) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ No.114/2005, Sowripalayam Village, form part of
S.F.No.275/Part 1 & 2, 276/Part 3 & 4 R.K.Mills B-Colony, Peelamedu Pudur, Coimbatore District.
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks the permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
S. Aruchamy
Inspector General of Registration
District Registrar
Sub Registrar
Secretary, Peelamedu Industrial Workers Co.operative Housing Construction Society Limited
M. Duraiswamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
