Allowed

K.Karuthammal, F/67 v. R.Kasammal, F/57

Madras HC21 Mar 2017CMP(MD)/9044/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Civil Appellate jurisdiction order granting liberty to the petitioner to withdraw a filed Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 and file a fresh Civil Miscellaneous Appeal instead of converting the petition, as the conversion was deemed unnecessary but the wrong forum caused limitation issues.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to withdraw CRP(MD) No.1454 of 2016 and file a fresh Civil Miscellaneous Appeal; pendency excluded for limitation.

K.Karuthammal, F/67 Vs R.Kasammal, F/57 — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶2

Tuesday, the Twenty First day of March Two Thousand Seventeen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Dr.Justice G.JAYACHANDRAN

¶5

CMP(MD) No.9044 of 2016 IN

¶6

CRP(MD) No.1454 of 2016

¶7

1 K.KARUTHAMMAL

¶8

2 MUTHU @ MUTHULAKSHMI

¶9

3 K.PAUNRAJ

¶10

4 K.UCKIRAIPANDI ... PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS

¶11

¶12

1 R.KASAMMAL

¶13

2 K.RAJAVADIVEL

¶14

3 MUTHUPANDIAMMAL

¶15

4 S.R.THANGAPANDI

¶16

5 S.R.SONAIMUTHIAH

¶17

6 S.R.THANGARAMAN

¶18

7 SATHYA

¶19

8 RAMAR ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

¶20

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to convert the above Civil Revision Petition in CRP(MD)No.1454 of 2016 into Civil Miscellaneous Appeal and the same kindly be taken on file and pass such other orders as this Honourable Court.

¶21

Prayer in CRP(MD). 1454/ 2016 :

¶22

To set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 12.09.2015 made in I.A.No.221/2013 in O.S.No. 19/2013 on the file of learned IVth Additional District Judge Madurai

¶23

ORDER : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S. C.JEGANNATHAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of M/S D.SADIQ RAJA, Advocate for R1 & R3, M/S.PALA RAMASAMY for R2, R4 to R6 on behalf of the Respondents the court made the following order:-

¶24

This application is filed to convert CRP(MD)No.1454 of 2016 filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the dismissal of the interlocutory application filed under Order 40 Rule https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1 CPC for appointment of receiver.

¶25

2.The respondents herein have raised objection regarding the maintainability of the revision petition in the light of Order 43 Rule 1(s) which provides appeal against the order passed under Order 40 Rule 1. Therefore, the present miscellaneous petition is filed under Section 115 CPC to convert this CRP into CMA.

¶26

3.This Court is of the opinion that conversion of the revision petition filed under the supervisory jurisdiction of the High Court need not be done, but granting liberty to the revision petitioner to withdraw CRP(MD)No.1454 of 2016 and file a fresh Civil Miscellaneous Appeal before appropriate forum, saving the limitation caused due to approaching wrong forum, is suffice.

¶27

4.Accordingly, liberty is given to the revision petitioner to withdraw CRP(MD)No.1454 of 2016 and file a fresh Civil Miscellaneous Appeal. For reckoning the period of limitation, pendency of CRP(MD) No.1454 of 2016 may be excluded.

sd/-

21/03/2017

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶32

¶33

THE IVTH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE MADURAI

¶34

Copy to The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai (to return the original document after taking photo copies of the order)

¶35

+1cc to Mr.Pala Ramasamy, Advocate, Sr No,16591 +1cc to Mr.Veera Associates, sr No.16405

¶36

ORDER IN CMP(MD) No.9044 of 2016 IN CRP(MD) No.1454 of 2016 Date :21/03/2017 MS/sv.mms/22.03.2017/2p.5c

¶37

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Karuthammal, F/67 v. R.Kasammal, F/57

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Karuthammal, F/67 v. R.Kasammal, F/57

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jothiraj, Vs Jayasreekumar

Manojkumar Vs the Inspector of Police

Vinoth Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Kavin Mary Vs Domnic Xavier James

Meenakshi Sundaram (Died) Vs M.Selvaraj (Died)

Nijamudeen Vs the Inspector of Police