3. The operative portion of the said Judgment reads as follows: “7.Taking note of the factual situation, we grant six weeks time to the sixth respondent/lessees as well as the first respondent/Sub-lessees to move the Government for appropriate relief. If the Revision Petitions filed by the lessee are in order, the Government shall consider the same and number those applications and also consider the maintainability or otherwise of the Petitions filed by the first respondent/sub-lessees seeking impleadment. Since the order of eviction was passed by the Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, on 22.06.2016, which was confirmed by the Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, on 10.08.2016, we grant six weeks time, from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment, to enable the first respondent/sub-lessees and the sixth respondent/sub-lessees to move the Secretary to Government Tourism, Culture and Endowment Department for appropriate orders either interim or final. If the first respondents/sub-lessees and the sixth respondents/lessees are unable to obtain any orders by then, it is open to the appellant temple to proceed further in accordance with law. Till the expiry of six weeks period, as fixed by this Court, the interim order of status-quo, which is prevailing as-on-today, shall be maintained by the parties and there shall be no threat of eviction.”
