Allowed

M.Subramanian, v. the District Revenue Officer

Madras HC15 Jun 2017CMP(MD)/1138/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court discharged the petition praying for an injunction. The court made absolute an existing interim order of status quo granted on 07.02.2017 to prevent prejudice to parties' rights during the appeal.

What did the court decide?

Made absolute the interim order of status quo granted on 07.02.2017 to restrain interference with the petitioner's possession pending the appeal's disposal.

M.Subramanian, Vs the District Revenue Officer — Property and Title | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶2

Thursday, the Fifteenth day of June Two Thousand Seventeen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Honble Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM and The Honble Mr.Justice P.VELMURUGAN

¶5

CMP(MD) No.1138 of 2017 IN

¶6

WA(MD) No.114 of 2017

¶7

M.SUBRAMANIAN, ... PETITIONER / APPELLANT / PETITIONER

¶8

¶9

1 THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER,

¶10

TRICHY, TRICHY DISTRICT.

¶11

2 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, REVENUE COURT, TRICHY, TRICHY DISTRICT

¶12

3 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TRICHY, TRICHY DISTRICT

¶13

4 THE TAHSILDAR, TRICHY WEST, TRICHY,

¶14

5 THE VILLAGE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, PIRATTIYUR EAST VILLAGE, TRICHY WEST, TRICHY

¶15

6 KALIKA PARAMESWARI TEMPLE

¶16

PERIYA KAMALA THERU, TRICHY,

¶17

REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE TRUSTEE, S.RAJENDRAN

¶18

... RESPONDENTS /RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS

¶19

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to grant an order of injunction restraining the 6th respondent from interfering with the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of the properties measuring an extent of 8.31 acres of agricultural land https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ situate in Re.Sy.No.18/4, 40/2, 40/3, 44/7 and 45/2 of Pirattiyur Village, Srirangam Taluk, Trichy District pending disposal of the Writ Appeal.

¶20

Prayer in WA(MD). 114/ 2017 :

¶21

To prefer this memorandum of Writ appeal before this Honourable Court against the order of His Lordship Honourable Court dated 02.12.2016 in W.P(MD) No.16867 of 2016 on the file of this Honourable Court

¶22

Prayer in WP(MD). 16867/ 2016 :

¶23

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court To issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent in Ma.No. P.28/2011 (Trichy) M.P.46/11, dated 21.11.2011 and quash the same.

¶24

ORDER : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.J.ANANDHAVALLI, Advocate for the petitioner and of M/S.T.V.SIVA KUMAR, FOR CAVEATOR, on behalf of the 6^th Respondent and this court while admitting the writ appeal made the following order:-

¶25

Record of the proceedings shows that at the time when the appeal was entertained, an interim order of status quo was granted by the Division Bench on 07.02.2017 and the said order is still in force.

¶26

2.Considering the fact that if the interim order of status quo is disturbed, it would prejudice the rights of the parties and it would render the appeal infructuous. Therefore, the interim order of status quo granted, on 07.02.2017, is made absolute.

sd/-

15/06/2017

/ TRUE COPY /

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶31

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶32

Madurai - 625 023.

¶33

¶34

1 THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER, TRICHY, TRICHY DISTRICT.

¶35

2 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, REVENUE COURT, TRICHY, TRICHY DISTRICT

¶36

3 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TRICHY, TRICHY DISTRICT

¶37

4 THE TAHSILDAR, TRICHY WEST, TRICHY,

¶38

5 THE VILLAGE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, PIRATTIYUR EAST VILLAGE, TRICHY WEST, TRICHY

¶39

ORDER IN CMP(MD) No.1138 of 2017 IN WA(MD) No.114 of 2017 Date :15/06/2017 SVA/PM/PN/20.06.2017/SAR1/3P/6C

¶40

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Subramanian, v. the District Revenue Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Subramanian, v. the District Revenue Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Devakkottai Municipality Vs R.Shanmugasundaram

Ilangovan Vs the Superintendent of Police

P.Sureshkumar, Vs the Superintendent of Police

O 293 Mela Ilandaikulam Vs Mariappan

Mekala Raj Vs the Presiding Officer

Amutha, F/60, Vs the State of Tn Rep by Its