Dismissed

The Director of School Edu v. the Corporate Manager

Madras HC24 Apr 2017CMP(MD)/3469/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court rejected an application to condone a delay of 984 days in filing a writ appeal. Despite the petitioners' explanation, the court found the delay unexplained. Consequently, the writ appeal was dismissed with a directive to implement the underlying order.

What did the court decide?

Application for condonation of delay rejected; writ appeal dismissed; petitioners directed to implement order within six weeks.

The Director of School Edu Vs the Corporate Manager — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 24.04.2017

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VELMURUGAN

¶6

C.M.P.(MD)No.3469 of 2017

¶7

in W.A.(MD).No.SR.12276 of 2017

¶8

1.The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai – 600 006.

¶9

2.The Chief Educational Officer, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil – 629 001.

¶10

3.The District Educational Officer, Thuckalay, Kanyakumari District. ...Petitioners/Appellants

¶11

Versus

¶12

The Corporate Manager, CSI Corporate Schools, CSI Diocese of Kanyakumari, NO.71A, Dennis Street, Nagercoil – 629 001. ... Respondent/Respondents

¶13

Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay of 984 days in filing the appeal against the order, dated 30.04.2014, in W.P.(MD).No.7778 of 2014.

¶14

For Petitioners : Mr.V.Muruganantham Additional Government Pleader

¶15

ORDER (Order of the Court was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J )

¶16

This application is filed by the Director of School Education and two others, to condone the delay of 984 days in filing writ appeal against the order in W.P.(MD).No.7778 of 2014, dated https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 30.04.2014. In paragraph five of the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the petitioners have stated the reasons for filing the

¶17

¶18

appeal belatedly.

¶19

It is seen that only after the contempt petition filed by the respondent/writ petitioner in C.P.(MD).No.161 of 2016 and notice was ordered, steps have been taken to prosecute the appeal. Though it is stated that the appeal was presented much earlier, the affidavit does not disclose proper reason for condoning the delay. Therefore, we have no hesitation to hold that the delay remain unexplained. However, we have perused the order passed by the Writ Court, from which it is seen that the Writ Court followed the decision of the Division Bench in the case of the Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai -6 and Others Vs. Goldon Wifred Viola and another , reported in 2009(2) TLNJ 101 (Civil) and another decision in the case of N.K.Geetha Vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu , reported in 2009(1) CTC 463 . Thus, on merits also the petitioners have not made out any case. Hence the application filed by the petitioners for condoning the inordinate delay is rejected and dismissed. Consequently, writ appeal stands rejected. Since we have rejected the writ appeal at the condone delay stage, the petitioners are directed to implement the order passed in the writ petition, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶20

Sd /-

¶21

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(RECORDS)

¶22

/TRUE COPY/

¶23

SUB ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶24

¶25

1.The Director of School Education,

¶26

College Road,

¶27

Chennai – 600 006.

¶28

2.The Chief Educational Officer,

¶29

Kanyakumari District,

¶30

Nagercoil – 629 001.

¶31

3.The District Educational Officer, Thuckalay, Kanyakumari District.

¶32

+1CC to Mr.T.CIBI CHAKRABORTHY Advocate in Sr.No.21040 +1cc to THE SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER in Sr.No.21516 jikr/sss

¶33

MAS/JC:04.05.2017:2P-6C

¶34

C.M.P.(MD)No.3469 of 2017 in W.A.(MD).No.SR.12276 of 2017 24.04.2017

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

The Director of School Edu v. the Corporate Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Director of School Edu v. the Corporate Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M. Kasimuthu Vs the Additional Director

R.Inbasekaran, Vs the Learned Principal District

P.Sudha Vs the Superintendent of Police

The Chairman Vs v.Sasikumar

V.Subramanian, S/O Vellaichamy Vs the Principal District Judge

M. Tamilmaran Vs the Director of Town &