Allowed

K.Veeraperumal, v. the Secretary

Madras HC22 Feb 2017CMP(MD)/1765/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court allowed a Miscellaneous Petition to condone a delay of 321 days in representing a Writ Appeal regarding a selection list revision for Assistant Public Prosecutors. The court conditioned condonation on the payment of Rs.750/-.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 321 days in filing the appeal was condoned on condition that the petitioner pays Rs.750/- within one week.

K.Veeraperumal, Vs the Secretary — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Second day of February Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT

¶2

The Honble Mr.Justice R.SUBBIAH and The Honble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU

¶3

CMP(MD) No.1765 of 2017 IN WA(MD) No.SR 5970 of 2016

¶4

K.VEERAPERUMAL ... PETITIONER/APPELLANT

¶5

¶6

1 THE SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, FORT ST. GEORGE, CHENNAI-9

¶7

2 THE SECRETARY TAMIL NADU PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, FRAZER BRIDGE ROAD, V.O.C.NAGAR, PARK TOWN, CHENNAI-03.

¶8

3 THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMNATION TAMIL NADU PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION FRAZER BRIDGE ROAD, V.O.C.NAGAR, PARK TOWN, CHENNAI-03.

¶9

4 S.BALAMURUGAN ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

¶10

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to condone the delay of 321 days in representing the above Writ Appeal in WA(MD). SR.No.5970 of 2016 and thus render justice. 6

¶11

PRAYER IN WA(MD) No.SR 5970 of 2016

¶12

To call for the records relating to the order passed by this Hon`ble Court in passed by in W.P(MD) No.12194 of 2014 dated 06.01.2016.

¶13

Prayer in WP(MD). 12194/ 2014 :

¶14

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court To issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to revise the selection list to call for 186 candidates for interview from the candidates who have come out successful in the written examination for the posts of Assistant public prosecutor - Grade II for the year 2011-2012 in the ratio of 1:2 for the 88 vacancies notified pursuant to the Notification NO. 4 of 2013 dated 06.03.2013 as per clause 21(b) of instructions to the candidates published by the commission and consequently hold a selection and make appointments to the eligible candidates within time framed by this Honble Court. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

ORDER : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.J.ANANDKUMAR, Advocate for the petitioner,the court made the following order:-

¶16

Order of the Court was made by R.SUBBIAH,J.

¶17

This petition seeking to condone the delay of 321 days in representing the appeal is allowed and the delay is condoned, on condition that the petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs.750/-, within a period of one week from today, to the credit of Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliation Center, attached to this Bench. It is made clear that if the cost is not paid by the petitioner within the time stipulated in this order, the present Miscellaneous Petition shall stand dismissed automatically without any further reference to this Court.

¶18

/ TRUE COPY /

¶19

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶20

¶21

1 THE SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, FORT ST.S GEORGE, CHENNAI-9

¶22

2 THE SECRETARY TAMIL NADU PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, FRAZER BRIDGE ROAD, V.O.C.NAGAR, PARK TOWN, CHENNAI-03.

¶23

3 THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMNATION TAMIL NADU PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION FRAZER BRIDGE ROAD, V.O.C.NAGAR, PARK TOWN, CHENNAI-03.

¶24

4.THE OFFICER INCHARGE, TAMIL NADU MEDIATION AND CONCILIATION CENTRE, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶25

MS/RSK/SAR3/23.2.2017/2P.5C

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Veeraperumal, v. the Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Veeraperumal, v. the Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

L.Anitha, Vs the State Tamil Nadu

Smt.M.Panchavarnam, Vs the Indian Oil Corporation

M.Mariyammal A-58 Vs the Superintendent of Police

D.Durga Devi, Vs Union of India

S.Mahalingam Vs the Superintendent of Police

Kottaichamy, Vs the Superintendent of Police