The court condoned the 220-day delay in filing the appeal after being satisfied with the affidavit reasons and directed the registry to number and list the appeal for admission.
Condoned the delay of 220 days and directed numbering of the appeal for admission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP No.1 of 2015 in CMA SR No.40919 of 2015
S.SOUNTHAR, J.
Mr.S.S.Swaminathan, learned counsel takes notice for the respondent.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the second respondent.
Being satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed along with the petition, the delay of 220 days in filing the appeal is condoned.
Registry is directed to number the civil miscellaneous appeal if it is otherwise in order and list the same for admission, along with the connected appeal in CMA SR No.92966 of 2015, after it got numbered.
Print the name of
Mr.S.S.Swaminathan, counsel for the respondent at the time of admission.
mst
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay of 220 days in filing the appeal is condonable.
Whether the appeal ought to be admitted after numbering.
Whether the delay in filing the memorial should be condoned.
Petitioner
Respondent
Second Respondent
S.SouNthar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
